<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 1/23/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Simon Huggins</b> <<a href="mailto:huggie@earth.li">huggie@earth.li</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:05:23AM +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:<br>> please before uploading exo/thunar change the package version to<br>> reflect upstreams <a href="http://0.3.1.2">0.3.1.2</a> and 0.2.0 respectively.
<br><br>What assurances have upstream made about future versioning?</blockquote><div><br>I expect upcoming releases will have increasing version numbers. Were there<br>any problems with exo/thunar regarding this issue?<br>
</div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">In a way, although it's ugly, I'd prefer say<br>0.1.999-really-0.2.0alpha-blah etc if they are going to subsequently
<br>realease 0.2.0.</blockquote><div><br>I think the alpha in the name wants to suggest the alpha quality of thunar (whatever<br>that means in Benedikt's dictionary) not that 0.2.0beta r1 and final will follow.<br></div></div>
<br>Jani<br>