Bug#557765: libfishsound1-dev: The -dev package should be named libfishsound-dev

[John Ferlito]

close 557765
tags 557765 wontfix

The debian packaging guide says you can do it both ways and there
doesn't seem to be a consensus on the right way. I'm going to leave it
as is.

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:06:11AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> The -dev package should be named libfishsound-dev, without the 1, so that
> reverse dependencies don't need to bump their build dependency whenever
> the ABI changes.

Cheers,
John

-- 
John
Blog                             http://www.inodes.org
LCA2010                          http://www.lca2010.org.nz