[Pkg-zope-developers] Re: about the pkg-zope repositories

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Andreas Tille <tillea at rki.de> [2005.08.15.2228 +0200]:
> If you ask me personally we could even go for *unstable*.
> Unstable has its name for a reason.  It is not a big deal to port
> a package to the new system.  If we agree on NMUs for this purpose
> on the pkg-zope list, we would be much faster, IMHO.

I think it is going to take a while for things to work smoothly, and
for us to harness the power of zope-common. Sure, there's unstable,
and our work is not even really experimental (thanks to doko and
Ubuntu), but it does seem like an awful long road to complete this
transition. I'd prefer experimental.

> >Does this sound like a fair deal? Comments welcome?
> I puttet
> 
>    Uploaders: Debian Zope team <pkg-zope-developers at lists.alioth.debian.org>
> 
> in my newly uploaded zope-* packages.  This means I'm happy with an
> upload of a member reading this list.

Great. I meant to ask in my previous mail: do you guys mind if we
call it "Debian/Ubuntu Zope team"? The rationale is that Ubuntu has
done a lot of the work, and I would personally like to see pkg-zope
as being the sole source for Zope-related packages for Debian and
Ubuntu, and have Debian as well as Ubuntu people work together on
this.

Cheers,

-- 
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck at debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
"without music, life would be a mistake."
                                                 - friedrich nietzsche
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-zope-developers/attachments/20050816/3a88d6fa/attachment.pgp