Development for wheezy

Jonas Meurer jonas at freesources.org
Thu Mar 10 13:11:01 UTC 2011


Hey Brian,

On 10/03/2011 Brian Sutherland wrote:
> > > Is there any way that the zope2 packaging can use the python-zope.*
> > > packages rather than including their own copies?
> > > 
> > > Anything the python-zope.* packages can do differently to help that come
> > > about?
> > 
> > The problem is, that Zope eggs aren't backwards compatible. Or, the
> > other way around, Zope2 releases depend on a very particular version of
> > Python Zope eggs. Thus I'm not sure what can be done in order to use
> > python-zope.* packages by Zope2 packages.
> 
> Isn't that "very particular version" precisely the version in a ZTK
> release?

Not sure about that.

From what I understand, Zope2.12 depends on loads of Python Zope eggs,
and particular versions of them. See the list at
http://download.zope.org/Zope2/index/2.12.9/versions.cfg for more
information. Several dependencies even have comments about incompatible
changes in more recent versions.

With the release of Zope2.13, the list of dependencies has significantly
decreased: http://download.zope.org/Zope2/index/2.13.5/versions.cfg
Zope2.13 ships with, and depends on Zope Toolkit 1.0.

What are the plans about packaging ZTK for Debian? Do you intend to
package major ZTK versions (1.0, 1.1, ...) seperately for Debian? That
indeed would ease the packaging work for Zope2 Packages a lot, beginning
with Zope2.13.

greetings,
 jonas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-zope-developers/attachments/20110310/fa2efc32/attachment.pgp>


More information about the pkg-zope-developers mailing list