[Po4a-devel]Documentation review (fwd)

Martin Quinson martin.quinson@imag.fr
Thu, 30 Dec 2004 22:02:12 +0100


--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 09:24:49PM +0100, Jordi Vilalta wrote:
> -There is two main advantages to this approach:
> +There are two main advantages to this approach:

Indeed, that's a typo.

> This made me remember the documentation review we were talking about one=
=20
> month ago. Are there any news? Should this patch be added to the complete=
=20
> review? (I don't remember if it was already there).

It should, and I have no idea where we stand with the previous review. I'd
say that you can commit it (I was about doing it myself, but I don't want to
step on your feet), before it gets lost.

Thanks, Mt.

--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB1GzUIiC/MeFF8zQRAmG5AJ9NWLuOXL0HYBXEPkC8z4wKLpx0/wCeJbFa
2J5QiTnHg/thZzLiw/3o7ow=
=/j+Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--