[Po4a-devel]Re: [Po4a-commits] po4a/t/data-04 text-iso8859.pod-ok,1.2,1.3 utf.pod-ok,1.1,1.2

[Martin Quinson]

On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 09:23:34PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 12:58:58AM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 06:18:37PM +0000, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > > Update of /cvsroot/po4a/po4a/t/data-04
> > > In directory haydn:/tmp/cvs-serv31074/t/data-04
> > > 
> > > Modified Files:
> > > 	text-iso8859.pod-ok utf.pod-ok 
> > > Log Message:
> > > Do not write po4a version number in generated files, this number
> > > has to be fixed everytime in test files.
> > 
> > Don't you think this information is precious anyway in the files?
> 
> It is annoying not only for us, but also for people keeping generated
> files under version control.  We cannot tell that po4a is robust because
> it has been tested only by few persons, and so I for one prefer keeping
> generated files under version control for my own packages (to detect
> content changes), ie. po-debconf for now and a Debiandoc SGML document
> (release-notes.en.sgml) should follow soon.
> When po4a is more tested and proven to be robust, generated files can
> be removed from CVS/SVN repositories and writing po4a version number
> into generated files becomes harmless.

They shouldn't put the generated file in CVS anyway. But that's an old
story, and I still don't have the argument to convince you, so I stop
objecting to the change ;)

> This is just my opinion, you can change this behaviour if you fix test
> cases ;)

Nono, forget it ;)

Thanks, Mt.