[Po4a-devel] before filing a bug report...

[Martin Quinson]

Hello

I do agree. That's a bug that you should fill. But I need more
information here, like a pointer to the specification of asciidoc and
a document using that feature. 

It would be really really cool if you could provide a test case for
the feature that you would like to see implemented (check in the t/
directory in the archive for the filenames to use and the kind of code
to write if you know some perl). Even only the asciidoc and po files
with no Perl would be really helpful.

Naturally, a patch for the feature would be the best, but the test is
already really helpful if you want to see that feature implemented.

Thanks, Mt.

On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 06:08:44PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> It seems that the asciidoc filter of po4a does not "understand" include::
> macros.
> 
> That would be a veeery nice addition and will put po4a + asciidoc on-par
> with sphinx that handle translation of included file perfecty well....
> (a little antagonism is well put here... ;-)
> 
> With multi-chapters documents you have to create apposite scripts to
> handle this, see this ugly hack for instance:
> 
> https://github.com/ciampix/kicad-doc/blob/master/src/Makefile#L107
> 
> My humble opinion is that this is a bug.
> 
> May I file a bug report?
> 
> --
> 
> 
> Marco Ciampa
> 
> I know a joke about UDP, but you might not get it.
> 
> +------------------------+
> | GNU/Linux User  #78271 |
> | FSFE fellow       #364 |
> +------------------------+

-- 
Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.  -- Pablo Picasso
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/po4a-devel/attachments/20150528/c22232b1/attachment.sig>