[py3porters-devel] [tryton-debian] Bug#783029: Packaging of suds-jurko

Lionel Elie Mamane lionel at mamane.lu
Wed Apr 29 10:21:48 UTC 2015


On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:46:01AM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> * Lionel Elie Mamane: " Re: [tryton-debian] Bug#783029: [py3porters-devel]
>   Packaging of suds-jurko" (Tue, 28 Apr 2015 16:32:23 +0200):
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:27:12PM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>>> * Lionel Elie Mamane: " [tryton-debian] suds in Debian" (Tue, 28 Apr 2015
>>>   13:24:25 +0200):

>>>> I just uploaded the jurko fork of suds (the latter you are maintainer
>>>> of in Debian) to Debian.

>>> I am quite surprised to hear that. Your package even doesn't seem to
>>> close an ITP bug. Could you please provide the link to your
>>> packaging sources?

>> https://people.debian.org/~lmamane/suds/

> You don't have permission to access /~lmamane/suds/suds-jurko_0.6-2.dsc on this
> server.

Fixed.

>>> Sorry, coordinating before uploading to NEW would have been much more
>>> appropriate, (...).

>>> Before commenting further I would like to hear about your motivations:

>> My motivation is purely having a working suds for Python3 so that I
>> can use stdnum.eu.vat.check_vies in Python3 (see
>> https://bugs.debian.org/774948 ). If my work is useful to others,
>> then I'm happy to share it, if not I'll keep it is a local package
>> for me.

>> Since you seem to have good not-too-long-term plans, I'm happy if we
>> ask ftpmaster to reject my upload to make way for your plans.

> The current state is:

> - pysimplesoap[0] seems to be a promising and maintained project.

> I think - provided pysimplesoap qualifies as a replacement for suds

It seems to present a different API, though?

> (...) I ask you indeed to wait with your package (i.e. to ask
> ftp-masters to not consider it for the moment).

I just asked them to reject it.

-- 
Lionel



More information about the py3porters-devel mailing list