[Reportbug-maint] Fwd: reportbug name usage

[Chris Lawrence]

FYI.  I told Gary I didn't personally have a problem with his request,
but that I'd pass it along to the maintainers group.


Chris

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Gary Kramlich <grim at reaperworld.com>
Date: Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 9:35 PM
Subject: reportbug name usage
To: lawrencc at debian.org


Hi Chris,

I hope I'm not intruding, but I'm in the scoping phase of a new library
that I plan to integrate the action of reporting bugs in applications in
an abstract way.  The idea is very similar to reportbug, but the idea is
to do it in an distribution/OS abstracted way.

Anyways, the real purpose of this email is about the name reportbug.
Right now, I'd leaning towards "libreportbug", but I wanted to get your
approval before I go ahead and use it.

If you say no, I understand.  The last thing I want to do is add
potential confusion on which package does what.  And to me a name is a
name, libreportbug just seems to describe it very well.

Anyways, thanks for your time,

--
Gary Kramlich <grim at reaperworld.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reportbug-maint/attachments/20081213/a5abc7bf/attachment.asc