[Reportbug-maint] Bug#373293: closed by "Sandro Tosi" <matrixhasu at gmail.com> (Your version of <package> (<version>) is newer than that in Debian - fixed)

[Thomas Weber]

Am Dienstag, den 01.07.2008, 17:52 +0200 schrieb Sandro Tosi:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 09:42, Thomas Weber <thomas.weber.mail at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 30.06.2008, 15:36 +0000 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking
> > System:
> >> E-Mail-Nachricht-Anlage
> >> > -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
> >> > Von: Sandro Tosi <matrixhasu at gmail.com>
> >> > An: 386666-done at bugs.debian.org, 362698-done at bugs.debian.org,
> >> > 373293-done at bugs.debian.org
> >> > Betreff: Your version of <package> (<version>) is newer than that in
> >> > Debian - fixed
> >> > Datum: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:33:50 +0200
> >> >
> >> > Version: 3.39-0.1
> >> >
> >> > As reported in changelog for that version:
> >> >
> >> >   * Indicate that in mode > standard incoming and NEW are also checked with
> >> >     --check-available (Closes: #450523, #447380)
> >> >
> >> > So, this bug is fixed, as long as you use "mode > standard"; infact:
> >
> > Eh, no. For one, I used the standard mode, as indicated by reportbug in
> > the bug report.
> 
> Here is a strict greater-than

Misunderstanding on my part.
> >
> > [1] I use Romain's emacs-snapshots packages from his homepage and the
> > full changelog starting 2004 is included.
> 
> Mh, well, I don't know how packaging system react to the same package
> version in repo installed from a non-ufficial one. 

At the time I reported the bug, emacs-snapshot was an official package.
I only mentioned the above to show that the changelogs of the now
unofficial emacs-snapshot package also cover the old case.


> Anyhow, are you still able to reporduce this bug? 

No, which is part of the problem :) and the reason I didn't reopen the
bug.

Anyway, if it pops again, I'll come back.

Thanks for caring. 

	Thomas