[Reportbug-maint] Bug#543147: reportbug: desktop file presence should equal working installation
Philipp Kern
pkern at debian.org
Sat Aug 22 20:29:01 UTC 2009
Package: reportbug
Version: 4.6
Severity: normal
reportbug drops a desktop file into a directory which is automatically
picked up by DEs and thus makes the impression to be installed. However,
when one tries to invoke it through said desktop file it wants python-vte
to be installed first. I think the presence of the icon should equal
a working installation.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii apt 0.7.22.2 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii python 2.5.4-2 An interactive high-level object-o
ii python-reportbug 4.6 Python modules for interacting wit
reportbug recommends no packages.
Versions of packages reportbug suggests:
pn debconf-utils <none> (no description available)
pn debsums <none> (no description available)
pn dlocate <none> (no description available)
ii file 5.03-1 Determines file type using "magic"
ii gnupg 1.4.9-4 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep
pn postfix | exim4 | mail-transp <none> (no description available)
pn python-gnome2-extras <none> (no description available)
ii python-gtk2 2.14.1-3 Python bindings for the GTK+ widge
pn python-urwid <none> (no description available)
pn python-vte <none> (no description available)
pn xdg-utils <none> (no description available)
-- no debconf information
More information about the Reportbug-maint
mailing list