[Reportbug-maint] Bug#690169: reportbug: incorrectly labels a binary package choice as "Source:"

[Andrei POPESCU]

On Lu, 27 oct 14, 19:07:24, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:48:53 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> 
> > Control: severity -1 critical
> > 
> > > Arguably this should even be considered RC and/or considered for a 
> > > stable update (assuming the fix is not too intrusive), because a lot of 
> > > bugs can get "lost", including important ones (RC, transition blockers, 
> > > etc.).
> > 
> > Indeed, this destroys reportbug!
> 
> Hm ... While I agreed that this bug is annoying, "critical" [0] seems
> a tad over the top. If it were my call, I'd stay with the previously
> used "important" severity.

Critical might be a tad too much, but definitely 'serious' (i.e. RC). 
Just as a data point, I get via unknown-package@ on average 1-2 bugs 
*per day* due to this bug.

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reportbug-maint/attachments/20141027/73e20a72/attachment.sig>