[Reproducible-commits] [presentations] 01/01: minor tweaks, re-merge some slides, add armhf graph

Holger Levsen holger at moszumanska.debian.org
Sat Nov 7 13:52:43 UTC 2015


This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

holger pushed a commit to branch master
in repository presentations.

commit 8ee07171edf9592a71a2de8d2e4cf24d86355609
Author: Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org>
Date:   Sat Nov 7 13:52:26 2015 +0000

    minor tweaks, re-merge some slides, add armhf graph
---
 .../2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge.tex            | 39 ++++++++++------------
 2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/notes              |  1 -
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge.tex b/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge.tex
index 7397aa8..b80aa96 100644
--- a/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge.tex
+++ b/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge.tex
@@ -167,8 +167,8 @@
  \frametitle{Who are you?}
  \begin{itemize}
   \item Who has seen a previous talk about reproducible builds this year?
-  \item<2-3> Who has contributed to this effort?
-  \item<3> Who thinks "packages should produce reproducible binaries"
+  \item<2-3> Who has contributed to this effort already?
+  \item<3> Who thinks "packages \textbf{should} produce reproducible binaries"
     should be added to policy now?
  \end{itemize}
 \end{frame}
@@ -267,13 +267,6 @@
   \item Record the build environment: \texttt{.buildinfo}
   \item \texttt{strip-nondeterminism}
   \item \texttt{reproducible.debian.net}
- \end{itemize}
-\end{frame}
-
-\begin{frame}
- \frametitle{What we did since Summer 2014}
-
- \begin{itemize}
   \item \texttt{diffoscope} (formerly known as \texttt{debbindiff})
   \item \texttt{SOURCE\_DATE\_EPOCH}
   \item \texttt{disorderfs}
@@ -317,21 +310,11 @@
   \item \small{4k lines of Python and 5k lines Bash code run by 111 jenkins
   now running on 10 hosts}
   \item Continuously testing Debian testing, unstable and experimental
-  \begin{itemize}
-   \item \small{Previously amd64 only, now also armhf, more to come…}
-  \end{itemize}
- \end{itemize}
-\end{frame}
-
-\begin{frame}
- \frametitle{Update on reproducible.debian.net}
-
- \begin{itemize}
   \item Not just testing Debian, but also Coreboot, OpenWrt, NetBSD, FreeBSD,
   Archlinux and soon Fedora
   \item \texttt{amd64}: 109 cores and 194 GB RAM split on 8 VMs, provided by ProfitBricks.
-  \item \texttt{armhf}: 12 cores and 6 GB RAM on 4 systems, provided by Vagrant.
-  \item \small{We want more more more arm(64) cores! (but not this small...)}
+  \item \texttt{armhf}: 12 cores and 6 GB RAM on 4 systems, provided by
+  Vagrant at d.o.
  \end{itemize}
  \vfill
  \begin{center}
@@ -339,6 +322,20 @@
  \end{center}
 \end{frame}
 
+\begin{frame}
+ \frametitle{Future of reproducible.debian.net}
+
+ \begin{itemize}
+ \item We want more more more arm(64) cores!
+ \item ...
+ \begin{center}
+  \includegraphics[height=0.5\paperheight]{images/stats_pkg_state_armhf.png}
+  \vfill
+ \end{center}
+ \end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+
 \begin{frame}[fragile]
  \frametitle{Variations on reproducible.debian.net}
 
diff --git a/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/notes b/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/notes
index c40689e..9b8e84b 100644
--- a/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/notes
+++ b/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/notes
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
 - which screenshots to show?
 - help wanted to reduce sudo usage
 - emphasize we want more armhf+arm64 hw
--- show arm graph
 - mention we only test main. question: is there a database which packages from contrib can be legally blindly build?
 
 - Summary

-- 
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/reproducible/presentations.git



More information about the Reproducible-commits mailing list