[Reproducible-commits] [presentations] 01/02: more help wanted maintaining jenkins.d.n/o

[Holger Levsen]

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

holger pushed a commit to branch master
in repository presentations.

commit b342b0648de67aff616131f2b0211d1519c440a6
Author: Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org>
Date:   Sat Nov 7 15:32:39 2015 +0000

    more help wanted maintaining jenkins.d.n/o
---
 .../2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge.tex                     | 11 +++++++++++
 2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/notes                       | 13 +++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)

diff --git a/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge.tex b/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge.tex
index 0f3b4a5..d24ccf3 100644
--- a/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge.tex
+++ b/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge.tex
@@ -657,6 +657,17 @@ Build-Environment:
  \end{itemize}
 \end{frame}
 
+\begin{frame}
+ \frametitle{Help migrating the setup(s) to \texttt{.debian.org} infrastructure}
+
+ \begin{itemize}
+  \item \texttt{sudo pbuilder} doesn't really make DSA happy, but the
+  maintenace script really makes DSA unhappy. (Think \texttt{sudo kill -9 *}.)
+  \item DSA would give us more build nodes of other architectures, but…
+  \item<2> \texttt{jenkins.debian.org} migration: help much welcome here too.  
+ \end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
 
 \section{Questions, comments, ideas?}
 
diff --git a/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/notes b/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/notes
index 9b8e84b..3786b50 100644
--- a/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/notes
+++ b/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/notes
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
 - show package sets in more detail?
 - which screenshots to show?
+  issues
+  r.d.n/$src
+  archlinux
 - help wanted to reduce sudo usage
 - emphasize we want more armhf+arm64 hw
 - mention we only test main. question: is there a database which packages from contrib can be legally blindly build?
@@ -15,6 +18,16 @@
 -- rebuilding all of debian a month prio the release? I don't think the release team will like this.
 -- so?
 
+- no more source only uploads?
+-- should people be forced again to always do binary uploads, which only will be accepted when the checksum matches?
+-- probably not
+
+- distributing .buildinfo files
+-- probably 100000 files per suite, thats an 50% increase
+-- mirrors would not be happy, so they should not go there
+-- we'll need many more files though, when we have detached signatures
+-- revoking sigs?
+
 - rebuilders and sharing signed checksums
 -- almost no work has been done here
 -- individuelly signed checksums (think web of trust) could work in the Debian case (we have a gpg web of trust), but wont scale

-- 
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/reproducible/presentations.git