[Reproducible-commits] [presentations] 01/02: drop usage of 'I think…'

[Holger Levsen]

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

holger pushed a commit to branch master
in repository presentations.

commit fdef5b2857c060b80f6979098cb3577a3093fdba
Author: Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org>
Date:   Sat Nov 7 16:56:56 2015 +0000

    drop usage of 'I think…'
---
 .../2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge.tex                 |  5 ++---
 2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/notes                   | 17 +++++++----------
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge.tex b/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge.tex
index d382cb3..01a6ba4 100644
--- a/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge.tex
+++ b/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge.tex
@@ -615,8 +615,7 @@ Build-Environment:
   \item In our current design and practices, rebuilding stretch will require
   package versions which are not part of stretch.
   \item This design might put a high load on snapshot.debian.org.
-  \item<2-3>{Rebuilding all of debian a month prio the release? I don't think
-  the release team will like this. }
+  \item<2-3>{Rebuilding all of debian a month prio the release? The release team probably won't like this. }
   \item<3>{So? (Self contained reproducibility should be the goal…)}
  \end{itemize}
 \end{frame}
@@ -647,7 +646,7 @@ Build-Environment:
  \begin{itemize}
   \item Individuelly signed checksums (think web of trust) could work in the
   Debian case (we have a gpg web of trust), but won't scale.
-  \item<2-4> { So I think we need systematic rebuilders, run by large organisations
+  \item<2-4> { We'll probably need systematic rebuilders, run by large organisations
   (ACLU, NASA, NSA, Deutsche Bank, EDF \& Greenpeace).}
   \item<3-4> { …and automated installers for those… }
   \item<4> { …and howtos (\texttt {gpg --gen-key})…}
diff --git a/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/notes b/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/notes
index 7c4be57..b2cd9e3 100644
--- a/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/notes
+++ b/2015-11-08-MiniDebConfCambridge/notes
@@ -3,20 +3,17 @@
   r.d.n/$src
   pkg set: build-essential
 
-- emphasize we dont have a patch for dak? does it matter?
-- mention "Append only logs (-> binary transparency logs)" ?
 - merge "Status and next steps in Debian" slides?
+	- emphasize we dont have a patch for dak? does it matter?
+	  (if at "status and next steps"...)
 
-- "I don't think" & "So I think" - *I*?
 
+nice to have: 
+- variations:
+    kernel variations 3.16/4.1/2 vs 2.6.66
+    LANG=C 
 
-
-nice to have
-------------
-- improve on packages slide (2 patches per day...)
-- variations
-	kernel variations 3.16/4.1/2 vs 2.6.66
-- next:
+- todo next:
 	send mail to that dam dak bug. NOW.
 
 

-- 
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/reproducible/presentations.git