[Reproducible-commits] [blog] 01/01: add disclaimer: F_S_D is bad. (review much welcome)
Holger Levsen
holger at layer-acht.org
Tue Jun 21 07:40:05 UTC 2016
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
holger pushed a commit to branch master
in repository blog.
commit 9e8398afd669a7ff7b674d111d55dd1a758f7ed3
Author: Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org>
Date: Tue Jun 21 09:39:30 2016 +0200
add disclaimer: F_S_D is bad. (review much welcome)
---
drafts/60.mdwn | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drafts/60.mdwn b/drafts/60.mdwn
index 82b9c42..7520336 100644
--- a/drafts/60.mdwn
+++ b/drafts/60.mdwn
@@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ with this change; once enough data will be collected we will ponder whether
`FORCE_SOURCE_DATE` should be exported by helper tools (such as debhelper) or
manually exported by every package that needs it.
+(For those wondering: we still recommend to follow `SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH` always
+and don't recommend other projects to implement `FORCE_SOURCE_DATE`…)
+
With the drop of `texlive-bin` we now have only **three** [modified packages in our
experimental repository](https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/index_repositories.html).
--
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/reproducible/blog.git
More information about the Reproducible-commits
mailing list