[Reproducible-commits] [blog] 01/01: 67: improve wording regarding "accidentally-reproducible" packages

Ximin Luo infinity0 at debian.org
Tue Aug 9 00:00:26 UTC 2016


This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

infinity0 pushed a commit to branch master
in repository blog.

commit 33cb3f53ec97b205abe99c3bb1cd8a52d78f514a
Author: Ximin Luo <infinity0 at debian.org>
Date:   Tue Aug 9 02:00:10 2016 +0200

    67: improve wording regarding "accidentally-reproducible" packages
---
 drafts/67.mdwn | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drafts/67.mdwn b/drafts/67.mdwn
index 0ab0c33..73c1b8f 100644
--- a/drafts/67.mdwn
+++ b/drafts/67.mdwn
@@ -73,8 +73,9 @@ The following packages have become reproducible after being fixed:
 * [[!pkg ui-utilcpp]]/1.8.5-1 by Stephan Sürken.
 * [[!pkg xfonts-cronyx]]/2.3.8-8 by Anton Zinoviev, [[!patch 778230]] by Chris Lamb.
 
-The following packages appear to be reproducible now, either by accident or the
-maintainer(s) or developer(s) forgot to document what they did:
+The following newly-uploaded packages appear to be reproducible now, for
+reasons we were not able to figure out. (Relevant changelogs did not mention
+reproducible builds.)
 
 * [[!pkg libitext-java]]/2.1.7-1 by Emmanuel Bourg.
 * [[!pkg lice]]/1:4.2.5i-2 by Kurt Roeckx.
@@ -162,7 +163,7 @@ feature by default, which should result in reproducible builds (for C code)
 even with varying paths. So far we haven't had have many results due to
 disturbances in our build network in the last days, but it seems this would
 mean roughly between 5-15% additional unreproducible packages - compared to
-what we see now. We'll keep you updated on the numbers (and problems with 
+what we see now. We'll keep you updated on the numbers (and problems with
 compilers and common frameworks) as we find them.
 
 lynxis continued work to test [LEDE](https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/lede/)

-- 
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/reproducible/blog.git



More information about the Reproducible-commits mailing list