[Reproducible-commits] [reproducible-website] 12/55: Clarify status of Debian-patched SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH SUPPORT
Chris Lamb
chris at chris-lamb.co.uk
Tue Aug 23 13:39:50 UTC 2016
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lamby pushed a commit to branch master
in repository reproducible-website.
commit 3ebe6d0cd83ee8cafa20228ee038f072f963c8f4
Author: Niko Tyni <ntyni at debian.org>
Date: Mon Nov 2 17:23:13 2015 +0200
Clarify status of Debian-patched SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH SUPPORT
The old sentence probably had a were -> where typo, but I'm not
quite sure. Hope this was the intended meaning.
---
_docs/timestamps.md | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/_docs/timestamps.md b/_docs/timestamps.md
index 3d0d583..74e1d6d 100644
--- a/_docs/timestamps.md
+++ b/_docs/timestamps.md
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ variable has been [formally
defined](https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/) in
the hope of wider adoption.
-[^list]: As of 2015-10-26, the following tools are known to support `SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH`: help2man, Sphinx. And [more where modified in Debian](https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsProposal#Reading_the_variable) already.
+[^list]: As of 2015-10-26, the following tools are known to support `SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH`: help2man, Sphinx. Also, [others have been modified locally in Debian](https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsProposal#Reading_the_variable) already to support this.
Changes required to support `SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH` are usually fairly
small and easy to write. Patches for tools which don't yet support the
--
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/reproducible/reproducible-website.git
More information about the Reproducible-commits
mailing list