[presentations] 01/04: more wip
Holger Levsen
holger at layer-acht.org
Thu Jan 26 15:45:25 UTC 2017
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
holger pushed a commit to branch master
in repository presentations.
commit acb28feb7309e26db67117dddfe63e941778b44a
Author: Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org>
Date: Thu Jan 26 16:44:54 2017 +0100
more wip
---
2017-01-27-devconf.cz/2017-01-27-devconf.cz.tex | 14 ++++++++------
2017-01-27-devconf.cz/TODO | 6 ++----
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/2017-01-27-devconf.cz/2017-01-27-devconf.cz.tex b/2017-01-27-devconf.cz/2017-01-27-devconf.cz.tex
index 649f3e3..54657af 100644
--- a/2017-01-27-devconf.cz/2017-01-27-devconf.cz.tex
+++ b/2017-01-27-devconf.cz/2017-01-27-devconf.cz.tex
@@ -632,11 +632,10 @@ hour, minute & \multicolumn{2}{l}{hour is usually the same… usually, the minut
\begin{itemize}
\item This is a proof-of-concept, Debian is neither 91.2\% reproducible nor
75.8\%. (and 10\% > 2,300 sources packages!)
- \item<2-4> All our required changes are finally in Debian now, except
- \texttt{dpkg} and \texttt{.buildinfo} file support on the archive side.
+ \item<2-4> All our required changes are finally in Debian now!
\item<3-4> We hope that Debian 9, "stretch", will be partially reproducible
in a meaningful way, in 2017.
- \item<3-4> What's beyond (rebuilding, \texttt{.buildinfo} file handling, user
+ \item<3-4> Though, what's beyond (rebuilding, \texttt{.buildinfo} file handling, user
tools) still needs \it{design} and code.
\item<4> Will Debian 10, "buster", be 100\% reproducible?
\end{itemize}
@@ -759,7 +758,7 @@ where}\only<2>{gamblingmachines}!)
\begin{itemize}
\item<1-3> So far we mostly worked on enabling us to do reproducible builds…
\item<2-3> We'll need constant tests for future code.
- \item<3> And this still needs tools, infrastructure and policies to become
+ \item<3> And then, this still needs tools, infrastructure and policies to become
meaningful and to be used in practice.
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
@@ -772,8 +771,11 @@ where}\only<2>{gamblingmachines}!)
\item Different projects, different solutions?
\begin{itemize}
\item<2> something like \texttt{.buildinfo} files (defining the environment,
- the input and the output(s)) will be needed everywhere, but so far we only
- have them for Debian…
+ the input and the output(s)) will be needed everywhere:
+ \item<2> implemented for Debian (both in sbuild and well as
+ buildinfo.debian.net)
+ \item<2> work has begun for coreboot, LEDE/OpenWrt and Fedora (mock/koji)
+ and maybe OpenSuSE (OpenBuildService)
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
diff --git a/2017-01-27-devconf.cz/TODO b/2017-01-27-devconf.cz/TODO
index a50869c..e2ec33b 100644
--- a/2017-01-27-devconf.cz/TODO
+++ b/2017-01-27-devconf.cz/TODO
@@ -2,11 +2,10 @@
explain problem and solution better
also mention qa side effecs
-thank people for their work, diffoscope, disorderfs, armhf, mattia, val, … - mention peoples names and thank them.
-gsoc + outreachy
+meta: thank people for their work, diffoscope, disorderfs, armhf, mattia, val, … - mention peoples names and thank them.
- too many example rebuilders (aclu, adac…
+gsoc + outreachy
check dennis bio slide
@@ -34,7 +33,6 @@ diffoscope in fedora is 69
patched rpm from bernhard
mock, koji and .buildinfo files
dnf and yum might create different environment
-t.r-b.o/fedora
update skipping some
update debian graphs
--
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/reproducible/presentations.git
More information about the Reproducible-commits
mailing list