[blog] 02/04: reddit -> Reddit.

[Chris Lamb]

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

lamby pushed a commit to branch master
in repository blog.

commit f9f979408ef376e8f6b0a34f2bd1be05e536bafb
Author: Chris Lamb <lamby at debian.org>
Date:   Fri Aug 25 12:45:27 2017 +0100

    reddit -> Reddit.
---
 drafts/121.mdwn | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drafts/121.mdwn b/drafts/121.mdwn
index 2ff7d94..b212a01 100644
--- a/drafts/121.mdwn
+++ b/drafts/121.mdwn
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ easier for packages to meet it.
 * Holger Levsen [wrote a blog post](https://layer-acht.org/thinking/blog/20170812-reproducible-policy/)
   briefly describing the background and implications of this, to quote him: "we are <i>not 94% done</i> yet, rather more like half done or so. We still need tools and processes to <i>enable anyone to indepently verify</i> that a given binary comes from the sources it is said to be coming, this will involve distributing <code>.buildinfo</code> files and providing user interfaces in APT and elsewhere. And probably also systematic rebuilds by us and other parties. And 6 or 7% of the archive [...]
 * There were discussion threads on [Hacker News](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15010438)
-  and [reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/debian/comments/6touxc/new_debian_policy_packages_should_be_reproducible/).
+  and [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/debian/comments/6touxc/new_debian_policy_packages_should_be_reproducible/).
 * Rather obviously, this is not yet what we really want to achieve, which is "packages <b>must</b> be reproducible" and then we also need to define things around <code>.buildinfo</code> files and more.
 
 Reproducible work in other projects

-- 
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/reproducible/blog.git