[Secure-testing-team] DTSA advisory format

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Anthony DeRobertis <anthony at derobert.net> [2005.08.28.1914 +0200]:
> > - The install recommendation uses apt-get install foo. So we'd need to
> >   specify a list of all binary names here to properly install the update.
> >   Shouldn't we just recommend dist-upgrade instead? (If people use the
> >   testing security apt repo they don't have to cherry pick fixes)
> 
> apt-get dist-upgrade might very well pull in a lot of stuff which isn't
> related to the update (considering testing changes nightly, this is
> fairly likely).

apt-get install -t testing
would install all required packages from testing too, including new
dependencies.

-- 
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck at debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
i feel like i'm diagonally parked in a parallel universe.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/secure-testing-team/attachments/20050828/16a208d2/attachment.pgp