[Secure-testing-team] Security update for fuse

[Djoume SALVETTI]

Le mercredi 06/08/05 Micah Anderson <micah at debian.org> a écrit :
> > I think the biggest misnomer with testing-security is its name. Think of it
> > as sarge-security. This is why it was a blocker for the release - we needed
> 
> I disagree. The original intention of the secure-testing-team was not
> to be a temporary organization that went away when sarge released.
> Before sarge released it could have been viewed as "sarge-security" as
> sarge was "testing", but now that release has happened,
> "sarge-security" is in the hands of the "Secutiry Team". 
> 
> Now that sarge has released, this group is going to continue on in the
> vein that Joey Hess outlined in the section of his email[1] titled
> "Work after sarge's release". Most notably, "to start regular security
> updates for testing". Testing meaning testing, not sarge. It *was*
> sarge a few days ago, but it is no longer.

I think Andrew talk about the testing-security *queue*, not the team! :-)

Regards
-- 
Djoumé SALVETTI
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/secure-testing-team/attachments/20050608/170fe309/attachment.pgp