[Secure-testing-team] Re: Bug#349261: Bug#342943: only kronolith2 fixed

[Lionel Elie Mamane]

On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 10:47:28AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist wrote:

>>>> I'd suggest depreciating kronolith1 and forcing people on to
>>>> kronolith2, whcih although only a little better, is actually
>>>> supported upstream.

>>> The problem is that kronolith2 depends on version 3 of the horde
>>> framework (rather than version 2), that the two versions of horde
>>> cannot meaningfully cooperate and there are still some horde2
>>> applications that have not been ported to horde3. Basically,
>>> upstream has abandoned horde2 before they ported all their OWN
>>> code to horde3.

>>> So dropping horde2 is a regression, which explains why we haven't
>>> done it yet. But I'm toying with the idea, as we cannot
>>> meaningfully support it anyway. Ola, your opinion?

>> If kronolith1 (named kronolith) can not be fixed, and is not
>> supported at all by upstream I think we should drop it.

> It seems to be removed already.

Yes, that story spurred us into requesting removal from unstable of
the whole horde2 suite. This still leaves the security update to
stable, though.

-- 
Lionel