[Secure-testing-team] Vulnerability impact on issues

Moritz Muehlenhoff jmm at inutil.org
Wed Oct 28 18:30:06 UTC 2009


On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:05:00PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> I just had a chat with Raphael about the impact levels we currently set for 
> vulnerabilities in the tracker. We both came to the conclusion that our 
> current way of assigning that is rather sub-optimal.
> 
> At the moment we try to judge the impact, the bug type, the availability of 
> the issue and our priority which often is not easy to connect and we end up 
> with situations where it is very hard (not to say random) to set the impact.
> 
> Classifying security issues is a really hard task and known to be flawed. So I 
> think it's time to change what we are currently doing.
> 
> What about just setting what priority the issue has for us? We can't properly 
> classify the impact with three levels anyway.
> 
> Instead I propose we let the levels like they are but use them with the 
> meaning of priority. The tracker already says urgency so we need to change our 
> documentation regarding that and maybe optionally displaying the CVSS score 
> might be helpful (I know this score is flawed as well but it's better than 
> none).

Or let's simply get rid of them at all.

Cheers,
        Moritz



More information about the Secure-testing-team mailing list