[Shootout-list] Proposal: revised matrix multiplication test

[Isaac Gouy]

> Rather than this, I would prefer that all the work actually be 
> necessary.

imo a better way to start addressing that issue is to replace tests
which are worse than matrix - such as hash.

Doug Bagley thought it was a bad test, and everyone since has agreed.
Can we devise a replacement 'lookup' test which allows acceptable
solutions in both functional and imperative languages?

> Alternatives:
> It's not strictly necessary that we read in the matrix. 

Unless we really want IO to be a big part of the test 
shouldn't we avoid having any IO in a test?


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com