[Shootout-list] Re: Proposal: revised matrix multiplication test

[Aaron Denney]

On 2004-11-04, Isaac Gouy <igouy2@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> Alternatives:
>> >> It's not strictly necessary that we read in the matrix. 
>> >
>> > Unless we really want IO to be a big part of the test 
>> > shouldn't we avoid having any IO in a test?
>> 
>> A minimal amount shouldn't hurt our resolving power. 
>
> Maybe something to measure rather than assume?

Fair point.  I think I have a way to do this, but need to check a bit to
see whether it is feasible.

-- 
Aaron Denney
-><-