[Shootout-list] Re: New website look

[Isaac Gouy]

> > How about some minimal thought on what kind of graphic might have
> > some relevance? (Are you offering the services of a graphic
artist?)

> I'm not an artist and don't pretend to be.  But the old home page was
> much more pleasing to my eye.

Then forgive me for thinking that complaint is cheap.

> >> Also what happened to the links to the mailing list, news, etc.?
> >Seek and you shall find!
> What does that mean?

Have you tried to answer your own question by looking in Frequently
Asked Questions?


> You have more links that are more general *after* the more specific
> header "ackermann Clean program".

That's true enough - and the links have been tried *before* the more
specific header, and we may go back *before* that header. 

> Also Side-by-side is not very descriptive.
> Side-bye-side what?

'Side-by-side comparison' has been tried, and we may go back to that.


> I have a 21" display, which is not large by today's standards. 
Lucky you! 

> I don't think we should expect the viewer to adjust the size of the
> browser Window to make the web site look decent.

I don't think we should expect the viewer to buy a new monitor to make
the web site look decent.


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com