[Shootout-list] Re: OO (was Re: process creation & message passing)

Isaac Gouy igouy2@yahoo.com
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:20:29 -0700 (PDT)


--- Aaron Denney <wnoise@ofb.net> wrote:
> However, once you add an object system, you do get an OO language.
> Having the system be implementable in the language (e.g. CLOS)
> doesn't strike me as being good grounds for disqualification.

Being an ad-hoc roll-your-own implementation of OO was the grounds for
disqualification that I had in mind :-)

Here's a method:
- include the languages that definitely claim to be OO languages
- exclude the languages that don't claim to be OO languages
- argue about the undecided


		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail