[Shootout-list] Re: OO (was Re: process creation & message passing)
Isaac Gouy
igouy2@yahoo.com
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 08:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
> How about laziness? It's trivial in Haskell, possible to make fairly
> painless in the ML's and scheme, and can be a pain in the imperative
> languages.
It would be a pain to implement it properly - but we'd only need to
implement just enough to pretend it was sort-of maybe some-kind-of
emulation-of laziness.
> It's accurately reporting that OO that only uses those features in
> language X will be faster than OO using only those those features in
> language Y, because you can't turn off those features in language Y.
This just skipped all around the issue - what's core OO.
It took years for VB to scrape it's way from object-based to
object-oriented.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com