[Shootout-list] Re: OO (was Re: process creation & message passing)
Aaron Denney
wnoise@ofb.net
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:33:13 +0000 (UTC)
On 2004-10-21, Brandon J. Van Every <vanevery@indiegamedesign.com> wrote:
> Well, your view is quite a minority view. Almost nobody else out there
> is having a debate about whether C is an OO language or not.
No, it's clearly not. Just as clearly, it allows the use of OO
programming techniques.
> What do you see as the goal for the shootout? Trying anything and
> everything, no matter how brain dead?
Letting each language take its best shot at the task, and reporting how
well it does.
> I'm getting tired of all the various goals, honestly. I don't really
> believe that anyone's going to put any energy at all into *my* goals.
Of course not. Why should we? None of us here really have common goals
beyond "improve the shootout", and we have different ideas of what
"improve" means.
--
Aaron Denney
-><-