[Shootout-list] Re: OO (was Re: process creation & message passing)
   
    Aaron Denney
     
    wnoise@ofb.net
       
    Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:33:13 +0000 (UTC)
    
    
  
On 2004-10-21, Brandon J. Van Every <vanevery@indiegamedesign.com> wrote:
> Well, your view is quite a minority view.  Almost nobody else out there
> is having a debate about whether C is an OO language or not.
No, it's clearly not.  Just as clearly, it allows the use of OO
programming techniques.
> What do you see as the goal for the shootout?  Trying anything and
> everything, no matter how brain dead?
Letting each language take its best shot at the task, and reporting how
well it does.
> I'm getting tired of all the various goals, honestly.  I don't really
> believe that anyone's going to put any energy at all into *my* goals.
Of course not.  Why should we?  None of us here really have common goals
beyond "improve the shootout", and we have different ideas of what
"improve" means.
-- 
Aaron Denney
-><-