[Shootout-list] Re: OO (was Re: process creation & message passing)

[Bengt Kleberg]

Aaron Denney wrote:
...deleted
> Another is to look at the submissions, and say "that's not sufficiently
> OO".  But we should be able to back-up why we think it's not, and
> suggest to submitters what they can do to make it more OO.

i agree.

having said that i must admit that i find it very difficult to design 
tests that clearly tests that a language is ''sufficiently 
<something>''. when such a test is not possible (given my limited 
knowledge, and no suggestion from somebody smarter) i think it is ok to 
put it as a requierment, and not a test.


bengt