[Shootout-list] Stuff (wide range of languages)

[Isaac Gouy]

--- Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 April 2005 20:07, Brent Fulgham wrote:
> > Provide implementations in:
> > 1)  An interpreted langauge, a JIT language, and
> >     a compiled language.  This shows the range of
> >     performance we can expect (and helps to avoid
> >     setting too low a value of 'N' for compiled
> >     languages, or too high a value for interpreted
> >     languages.
> 
> You know OCaml can be interpreted in the top level and there are
> byte-code, 
> JIT and native code compilers?
> 
> I think I've satisfied clause (1). ;-)

That'll make a really interesting computer language comparison - OCaml
vs OCaml vs OCaml. At least you guarantee that OCaml wins :-)

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com