[Shootout-list] Re: Ray tracer

[Jon Harrop]

On Sunday 19 June 2005 02:14, Stephen Weeks wrote:
> Only the LOC will suffer.

Not if we're using the soft 100 LOC limit => only mine gets optimised.

> An understandable program is much better than a short program.  One
> reason I rewrote your raytracer program is so that I could understand
> it.  All the usual ML features (abstract types, modules, etc.) helped
> immensely, and I think would help others to understand the program as
> well.

Yes. I think comments are the most important thing. I'll comment the short 
OCaml version ASAP.

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists