[Shootout-list] Directions of various benchmarks

[Christophe TROESTLER]

On Tue, 17 May 2005, Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday 17 May 2005 04:35, skaller wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 10:53, Jon Harrop wrote:
> > > I disagree. Anything which fits well into an interpreted language (e.g.
> > > regexps in Perl) will be both fast and succinct.
> >
> > How interesting is it to compare Perl/PCRE with C/PCRE
> > with Python/PCRE with Ocaml/PCRE .. is it interesting to
> > compare PCRE with PCRE??
> 
> Why does the OCaml implementation of regex current use Markus' PCRE rather 
> than OCaml's built-in Str module?

It doesn't anymore (with a big speed improvement).

ChriS