On 5/16/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Michael Biebl</b> <<a href="mailto:biebl@debian.org">biebl@debian.org</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Package: splashy<br>Version: 0.3.3<br>Severity: normal<br><br>usplash is missing a conflicts with usplash. As a result you can install<br>both which will obviously lead to clashes.<br><br>Maybe it would make sense to add a virtual package "bootsplash-system"
<br>(better name appreciated) and each splash package in Debian<br>(bootsplash/usplash/splashy) should add a Conflicts/Provides:<br>bootsplash-system.<br><br>Would imo be the cleanest solution.<br><br>If you agree, feel free to clone the bug for usplash and bootsplash.
</blockquote><div><br><br>I'm glad you open a bug for this.<br><br>We had the package originally setup to conflict with a virtual package so that both usplash and splashy (plus any other) can conflict with e/a other.<br>
</div><br></div>As of this moment, the svn repository reads:<br><br>Conflicts: debsplash-utils, bootsplash, usplash<br><br>I guess this will be closed soon. A virtual package and "provides" is a better solution, of course. But...
<br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>----)(----- <br>Luis Mondesi<br>*NIX Guru<br><br>"Feliz el hombre que ha hallado sabiduria y el hombre que consigue discernimiento, porque el tenerla como ganancia es mejor que tener la plata como ganancia; y el tenerla como producto, [mejor] que el oro mismo" (Prov 3:13-14)