[Tahoe-debian] tahoe-lafs uploaded on mentors

[bertagaz at ptitcanardnoir.org]

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 08:58:46AM -0400, micah anderson wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:29:58 +0200, bertagaz at ptitcanardnoir.org wrote:
> > I've finally managed to upload a new zfec package as well as the
> > tahoe-lafs package itself on mentors.debian.net.
> 
> Great!
> 
> > I haven't tested them as much as last week, but it seems to install and
> > run fine.
> > 
> > http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=zfec
> > http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=tahoe-lafs
> 
> How come mentors.debian.net? Not that its bad, but we already have a git
> repository to build from, and mentors is a mechanism for finding
> sponsors for things, and I've already said I would do it. I am guessing
> there are some other advantages to using it that I am just not seeing
> thouough, but that is why I ask.

Ah, my fault, I was probably a bit confused and didn't realized you might
just use the git repo. I thought we had to use the same process than for
the python-zfec package.

> > Hope I didn't forgot/broke/missed something, but I trust micah to look at
> > it and find any issue :)
> 
> I will try to find something :)

ooooh, /me getting nervous :)

> > I'll post the remaining todo items soon.
> 
> does this mean that I should *not* upload tahoe until these items are
> done? or are these todo items that are independent of the upload?

No, sorry for the confusion, the todo item I'm referring to are long terms
one we discussed some times ago : init scripts, FHS compliance, some more
packages to do (pyutils and zbase32 basically) and upgrading pycryptopp...
We agreed to upload a release of this package without this features, so I
guess it's ok if you upload the package in the current state.

bert.