From traperpl at traperpl.eu Fri Sep 1 23:42:55 2006 From: traperpl at traperpl.eu (=?UTF-8?Q?Wojciech_Krzywa=F1ski?=) Date: Fri Sep 1 23:46:23 2006 Subject: [Utnubu-discuss] Traper Gniezno - Greetings from Poland Content-type: text/html Traper Gniezno

Greetings from Poland


www.traperpl.eu

Message-ID: From traperpl at traperpl.eu Sat Sep 2 19:55:27 2006 From: traperpl at traperpl.eu (=?UTF-8?Q?Wojciech_Krzywa=F1ski?=) Date: Mon Sep 4 06:44:16 2006 Subject: [Utnubu-discuss] Traper Gniezno - Greetings from Poland Content-type: text/html Traper Gniezno

Greetings from Poland


www.traperpl.eu

Message-ID: From nomeata at debian.org Mon Sep 4 17:30:42 2006 From: nomeata at debian.org (Joachim Breitner) Date: Mon Sep 4 17:31:10 2006 Subject: [Utnubu-discuss] Re: tango-icon-theme In-Reply-To: <44FC5A0A.50702@debian.org> References: <44FC5A0A.50702@debian.org> Message-ID: <1157391042.11114.2.camel@otto.ehbuehl.net> Hi Philipp, Am Montag, den 04.09.2006, 18:53 +0200 schrieb Philipp Kern: > I would like to upload `tango-icon-theme' under the hood of the Utnubu > project to Debian non-free. The CC-SA-2.0 licence is considered non-free > by d-legal, but I want to see it in Debian. > > What's the strategy to take? I need to modify the package to list > `utnubu-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org' as a maintainer, of course. > But which version number should I use? Ubuntu's version is > `0.7.2-0ubuntu3', and the other entries on the developer's overview seem > to suggest that I should upload the package with `0.7.2-1'. Is that right? Yes, that's how we've been doing it so far. It's not set in stone though: If you have reasons why it should be differnt (like 0.7.2-0ubuntu3-utnubu1 :-)), just tell us > (ITPs are #338448 and #335555; both persons stating the will to package > it did not do so either because the lack of time or the license; I > intend to hijack those, as both ITPs are dated Nov 2005. I consider the > Ubuntu packaging to be working great, I used it in the past.) Fine. Do you intend to put in the utnubu svn repository, too, or just use the "label" utnubu? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: joachimbreitner@amessage.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata From pkern at debian.org Mon Sep 4 19:28:01 2006 From: pkern at debian.org (Philipp Kern) Date: Mon Sep 4 19:27:37 2006 Subject: [Utnubu-discuss] Re: tango-icon-theme In-Reply-To: <1157391042.11114.2.camel@otto.ehbuehl.net> References: <44FC5A0A.50702@debian.org> <1157391042.11114.2.camel@otto.ehbuehl.net> Message-ID: <44FC7E41.1090800@debian.org> [Moving this to utnubu-discuss, then.] Joachim Breitner wrote: >> (ITPs are #338448 and #335555; both persons stating the will to package >> it did not do so either because the lack of time or the license; I >> intend to hijack those, as both ITPs are dated Nov 2005. I consider the >> Ubuntu packaging to be working great, I used it in the past.) > Fine. I will hit NEW in a few minutes, thanks. I did upload the version in `dapper', not the one in `edgy', for NEW processing and intend to update it later. > Do you intend to put in the utnubu svn repository, too, or just use the > "label" utnubu? Just the label, for now. Is there any way to `subscribe' to an Ubuntu package, like the PTS? I did not find such a feature in Launchpad, nor a RSS feed of updates of a given source package. Kind regards, Philipp Kern From nomeata at debian.org Mon Sep 4 21:40:21 2006 From: nomeata at debian.org (Joachim Breitner) Date: Mon Sep 4 21:40:48 2006 Subject: [Utnubu-discuss] Re: tango-icon-theme In-Reply-To: <44FC7E41.1090800@debian.org> References: <44FC5A0A.50702@debian.org> <1157391042.11114.2.camel@otto.ehbuehl.net> <44FC7E41.1090800@debian.org> Message-ID: <1157406021.3931.1.camel@otto.ehbuehl.net> Hi, Thanks for the upload. Am Montag, den 04.09.2006, 21:28 +0200 schrieb Philipp Kern: > Just the label, for now. Is there any way to `subscribe' to an Ubuntu > package, like the PTS? I did not find such a feature in Launchpad, nor a > RSS feed of updates of a given source package. Not that I know of, but there is the new "derivative" keyword in the bts, maybe it does what you want. You'd have to talk to Raphael Herzog about that, if I recall it correctly. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: joachimbreitner@amessage.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata From filippo at debian.org Tue Sep 5 09:52:32 2006 From: filippo at debian.org (Filippo Giunchedi) Date: Tue Sep 5 10:01:54 2006 Subject: [Utnubu-discuss] Re: tango-icon-theme In-Reply-To: <1157406021.3931.1.camel@otto.ehbuehl.net> References: <44FC5A0A.50702@debian.org> <1157391042.11114.2.camel@otto.ehbuehl.net> <44FC7E41.1090800@debian.org> <1157406021.3931.1.camel@otto.ehbuehl.net> Message-ID: <20060905095232.GB30274@esaurito.net> On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:40:21PM +0000, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the upload. > > Am Montag, den 04.09.2006, 21:28 +0200 schrieb Philipp Kern: > > Just the label, for now. Is there any way to `subscribe' to an Ubuntu > > package, like the PTS? I did not find such a feature in Launchpad, nor a > > RSS feed of updates of a given source package. > > Not that I know of, but there is the new "derivative" keyword in the > bts, maybe it does what you want. You'd have to talk to Raphael Herzog > about that, if I recall it correctly. you can subscribe to the PTS with the keyword derivatives (not sure about the s) and then you'll get all the ubuntu patches for that package (granted that it exists in the debian archive) filippo -- Filippo Giunchedi - http://esaurito.net PGP key: 0x6B79D401 random quote follows: Age is not a particularly interesting subject. Anyone can get old. All you have to do is live long enough. -- Groucho Marx -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/utnubu-discuss/attachments/20060905/6a6f10fb/attachment.pgp From hertzog at debian.org Mon Sep 18 08:44:25 2006 From: hertzog at debian.org (Raphael Hertzog) Date: Mon Sep 18 08:45:55 2006 Subject: [Utnubu-discuss] Preparing an Utnubu report Message-ID: <20060918084425.GD4087@ouaza.com> Hi, I think it's time to give some news of Utnubu to the broader Debian audience. I started to draft it: http://wiki.debian.org/Utnubu/Report Please expand it with all Utnubu/Ubuntu-related stuff which happened inside Debian. We should mention the Debian Collaboration Team in it, I haven't done so yet, Lucas can you draft a paragraph about it? Do we have other examples of packages which have been reintegrated from Ubuntu into Debian? Once we completed that we should send it to d-d-a. Cheers, -- Rapha?l Hertzog Premier livre fran?ais sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ From eddy.petrisor at gmail.com Mon Sep 18 12:09:58 2006 From: eddy.petrisor at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Eddy_Petri=C5=9For?=) Date: Mon Sep 18 12:10:27 2006 Subject: [Utnubu-discuss] Preparing an Utnubu report In-Reply-To: <20060918084425.GD4087@ouaza.com> References: <20060918084425.GD4087@ouaza.com> Message-ID: <60381eeb0609180509j49dbedb8i7b631abe18360129@mail.gmail.com> On 18/09/06, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > I think it's time to give some news of Utnubu to the broader Debian > audience. I started to draft it: > http://wiki.debian.org/Utnubu/Report > > Please expand it with all Utnubu/Ubuntu-related stuff which happened > inside Debian. > > We should mention the Debian Collaboration Team in it, I haven't done so > yet, Lucas can you draft a paragraph about it? > > Do we have other examples of packages which have been reintegrated from > Ubuntu into Debian? Do packages in REVU which will be intergrated in Debian count? :-) If so, Glest is on the virge of being included in Debian after being taken from REVU. > Once we completed that we should send it to d-d-a. > > Cheers, > -- > Rapha?l Hertzog > > Premier livre fran?ais sur Debian GNU/Linux : > http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ > > _______________________________________________ > Utnubu-discuss mailing list > Utnubu-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/utnubu-discuss > -- Regards, EddyP ============================================= "Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein From hertzog at debian.org Mon Sep 18 13:50:04 2006 From: hertzog at debian.org (Raphael Hertzog) Date: Mon Sep 18 13:51:34 2006 Subject: [Utnubu-discuss] Preparing an Utnubu report In-Reply-To: <60381eeb0609180509j49dbedb8i7b631abe18360129@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060918084425.GD4087@ouaza.com> <60381eeb0609180509j49dbedb8i7b631abe18360129@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20060918135004.GB5132@ouaza.com> On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Eddy Petri?or wrote: > >Do we have other examples of packages which have been reintegrated from > >Ubuntu into Debian? > > Do packages in REVU which will be intergrated in Debian count? :-) > > If so, Glest is on the virge of being included in Debian after being > taken from REVU. Why not? It's always good to show examples of fruitful cooperation between Ubuntu's MOTU (or MOTU hopeful) and DD or NM. Feel free to add a sentence to the report. Cheers, -- Rapha?l Hertzog Premier livre fran?ais sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ From mdz at ubuntu.com Fri Sep 29 20:01:11 2006 From: mdz at ubuntu.com (Matt Zimmerman) Date: Fri Sep 29 20:01:49 2006 Subject: [Utnubu-discuss] Information for Debian developers about Ubuntu Message-ID: <20060929200111.GW5655@alcor.net> (please CC me as I'm not subscribed) Following from various discussions I've had over the past several months with individual Debian developers, I've assembled a document which attempts to explain Ubuntu from the perspective of a Debian developer. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuForDebianDevelopers I've gone through a few rounds of feedback and revision with some folks by private email, and I think it's ready for more general consumption. I would appreciate further feedback from this group regarding the document itself, and also especially about how it could be presented to the Debian developer community without blowback of the sort which happened when such information was posted to -devel-announce. (with my Ubuntu hat on) Thanks, -- - mdz