[Utnubu-maintainers] Bug#399650: Bug#389605: New version of
bzrtools available
James Westby
jw+debian at jameswestby.net
Fri Nov 24 18:29:14 UTC 2006
On (23/11/06 20:30), James Westby wrote:
> 2) If you do not want to add a new upstream version to etch now then remove
> the warning from the code. As far as I know there is no
> functionality loss from this.
>
> I attach two patches, one for each solution. (Please note the second is
> not tested exactly, but it is the workaround I used when this problem
> started. The first patch is an svn diff from current trunk of what it
> would take to package a clean 0.11.0 tarball. The changes to
> debian/control could even be left out.
Ok, sorry, I said it wasn't tested, it doesn't even work. It should of
course pass in the if clause, or comment out the if as well.
Apologies for getting this wrong, but I think you get the idea of the
intent.
James
>
> Index: bzrtools-0.10.0/__init__.py
> ===================================================================
> --- bzrtools-0.10.0.orig/__init__.py 2006-11-23 20:17:19.000000000 +0000
> +++ bzrtools-0.10.0/__init__.py 2006-11-23 20:17:54.000000000 +0000
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
> ' \nThere should be a newer version available, e.g. %i.%i.'
> % (bzrlib.__version__, bzrlib_version[0], bzrlib_version[1]))
> if bzrlib_version != desired_plus:
> - raise Exception, 'Version mismatch'
> +# raise Exception, 'Version mismatch'
>
>
> check_bzrlib_version(version_info[:2])
--
James Westby -- GPG Key ID: B577FE13 -- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
More information about the Utnubu-maintainers
mailing list