[Utnubu-maintainers] Bug#399650: Bug#389605: New version of bzrtools available

James Westby jw+debian at jameswestby.net
Fri Nov 24 18:29:14 UTC 2006


On (23/11/06 20:30), James Westby wrote:
>   2) If you do not want to add a new upstream version to etch now then remove
>      the warning from the code. As far as I know there is no
>      functionality loss from this.
> 
> I attach two patches, one for each solution. (Please note the second is
> not tested exactly, but it is the workaround I used when this problem
> started. The first patch is an svn diff from current trunk of what it
> would take to package a clean 0.11.0 tarball. The changes to
> debian/control could even be left out.

Ok, sorry, I said it wasn't tested, it doesn't even work. It should of
course pass in the if clause, or comment out the if as well.

Apologies for getting this wrong, but I think you get the idea of the
intent.


James

> 
> Index: bzrtools-0.10.0/__init__.py
> ===================================================================
> --- bzrtools-0.10.0.orig/__init__.py	2006-11-23 20:17:19.000000000 +0000
> +++ bzrtools-0.10.0/__init__.py	2006-11-23 20:17:54.000000000 +0000
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
>                  ' \nThere should be a newer version available, e.g. %i.%i.' 
>                  % (bzrlib.__version__, bzrlib_version[0], bzrlib_version[1]))
>          if bzrlib_version != desired_plus:
> -            raise Exception, 'Version mismatch'
> +#            raise Exception, 'Version mismatch'
>  
>  
>  check_bzrlib_version(version_info[:2])




-- 
  James Westby   --    GPG Key ID: B577FE13    --     http://jameswestby.net/
  seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256





More information about the Utnubu-maintainers mailing list