[Virtual-pkg-base-maintainers] Bug#542147: base: System init no longer reliable
Michael.Burschik at gmx.de
Michael.Burschik at gmx.de
Wed Aug 19 05:17:03 UTC 2009
X-Loop
owner at bugs.debian.org: Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 05:12:34 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.542147.B542147.125065871620855 at bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner at bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 542147
X-Debian-PR-Package: base
X-Debian-PR-Keywords:
Received: via spool by 542147-submit at bugs.debian.org id=B542147.125065871620855
(code B ref 542147); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 05:12:34 +0000
Received: (at 542147) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2009 05:11:56 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 18; hammy, 125; neutral, 90; spammy,
6. spammytokens:1.000-1--gratification, 0.987-1--H*M:2070408, 0.964-+--enjoy,
0.916-+--limited, 0.896-+--waste hammytokens:0.000-+--H*u:20090103,
0.000-+--H*u:sk:Mozilla, 0.000-+--H*f:sk:2009081, 0.000-+--H*UA:20090103,
0.000-+--H*i:sk:2009081
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20])
by rietz.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <Michael.Burschik at gmx.de>)
id 1MddSm-0005Pm-3E
for 542147 at bugs.debian.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 05:11:56 +0000
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2009 05:11:49 -0000
Received: from p54BD8BA8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.178.21]) [84.189.139.168]
by mail.gmx.net (mp065) with SMTP; 19 Aug 2009 07:11:49 +0200
X-Authenticated: #3878099
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX192ljh5ONp2gguyLxepMluwVpe+3aqVpFgaoaPorg
lZs81pYfAk+7R1
Message-ID: <4A8B8993.2070408 at gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:11:47 +0200
From: Michael Burschik <Michael.Burschik at gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090103)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org>
CC: 542147 at bugs.debian.org
References: <20090818064319.3055.42079.reportbug at hellboy.bprd.gov> <200908180742.22847.holger at layer-acht.org> <4A8A4973.5080001 at gmx.de> <200908180933.06189.holger at layer-acht.org>
In-Reply-To: <200908180933.06189.holger at layer-acht.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.58
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Dienstag, 18. August 2009, Michael Burschik wrote:
>
>> Thank you very much for your helpful reply. So, Debian testing breaks my
>> system, and possibly others, too, but you don't really care.
>>
>
> I do care, thats why I replied and thats why I reply. It's just that your
> report is not really useful at all:
> - which packages did you upgrade when?
>
We are talking about Debian testing here. That means something like ten
to fifteen package updates every day (138 during the last seven days).
And since the problem is intermittent, I can't exactly say when the
broken package was installed.
> - what exactly broke how?
>
I'll repeat the problem: Sometimes, lvm disks are not mounted and dhcp
is not used.
> - with what error message(s)?
>
Error messages? Yes, of course, there was a big, fat, red ERROR MESSAGE
and I did not include it in my bug report just to make things more
difficult for you.
> "my system no longer initializes reliably" is basically as useful as "the
> internet is down", sorry.
>
Really? I would have thought the system initialization was a rather
limited and well-understood (by Debian developers that is) process, but
what do I know.
> If you provide useful information, it's easy to reopen this bug etc.
>
>
>> I sincerely apologize for wasting your time. In future, I will not file
>> any bug reports. I will also stop using Debian testing. I might even
>> stop using Debian.
>>
>
> You are free to do what you think is right. Enjoy!
>
And that's exactly what I'll do. The point is, I am not running Debian
testing for my own gratification, but as a service to Debian. I am
*testing* the distribution and writing bug reports to provide feed-back.
But I am no longer going to waste my time doing that.
>
> regards,
> Holger
>
Regards
Michael
More information about the Virtual-pkg-base-maintainers
mailing list