[Virtual-pkg-base-maintainers] Bug#761386: closed by Tomas Pospisek <tpo at sourcepole.ch> (Re: base: Colour problem when printing on a Samsung CLX-3175)

[H. Dieter Wilhelm]

> From: Tomas Pospisek <tpo at sourcepole.ch>
> Subject: Re: base: Colour problem when printing on a Samsung CLX-3175
> To: 761386-close at bugs.debian.org
> Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 20:40:31 +0200 (CEST) (1 day, 11 hours, 1 minute ago)

> Once the problem is narrowed down, then please fill a bug against a
> specific package. See below for some questions that you need to be
> able to answer before filling the bug report.

I see, I need to figure out the right package.

> > when printing with a Samsung CLX-3175 in colour or b&w, the colour and
> > grey composition of the prints is totally wrong.

> 1. does it matter from which programm you print? I.e. f.ex. from
>    LibreOffice or from Gimp, etc. ?

No, I tested at least two picture viewers and Iceweasel for printing.

> 2. Do you use CUPS for printing?

I think so, this seems to me the the default printing system on Debian.

> 3. If you are using CUPS, then you should be able to go to
>    http://localhost:631, go to Administration, pick your printer and see
>    how it's configured, i.e. what diver and what PPD it's using. It might
>    be interesting to compare that with the settings under Ubuntu, if you
>    still can access that Ubuntu instance.

Aha, I try to install and dual-boot into an Ubuntu and'll check.

Thank you for your patience

       Dieter




> 4. There's the "suld" driver for Samsung CLX printers [1], which is *not*
>    part of Debian. If you are using that driver package, then you need to
>    get in touch with it's authors directly.

> Thanks,
> *t

> [1] http://www.bchemnet.com/suldr/
> ----------



owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:

> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the base package:
>
> #761386: base: Colour problem when printing on a Samsung CLX-3175
>
> It has been closed by Tomas Pospisek <tpo at sourcepole.ch>.
>
> Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
> If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
> better one in a separate message then please contact Tomas Pospisek
> <tpo at sourcepole.ch> by
> replying to this email.

-- 
Best wishes
H. Dieter Wilhelm
Darmstadt, Germany