[Vmdebootstrap-devel] Bug#779704: Why not just use existing support

Neil Williams codehelp at debian.org
Sat May 2 19:48:43 UTC 2015


tag 779704 + moreinfo
thanks

I'm confused as to why it is beneficial to run tasksel inside the image
when it is easier to add the tasksel package to the initial list of
packages to pass to debootstrap, especially if the image is being built
with the --foreign option.

-- 


Neil Williams
=============
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/vmdebootstrap-devel/attachments/20150502/dc632103/attachment.sig>


More information about the Vmdebootstrap-devel mailing list