[Yaird-devel] Bug#518315: Bug#518315: deprecation notice of mkinitramfs-kpkg
Jonas Smedegaard
dr at jones.dk
Mon Mar 9 15:40:32 UTC 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 03:26:50PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 03:01:49PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>[snipp]
>>
>> It is true that yaird silently ignore some of the newer
>> initramfs-tools extensions to the mkinitrd interface, but not the -t
>> option which is now expected by linux-2.6 (see bug#518315).
>
>right so it is time to add it!
Time? What has time to do with it? Please provide reason!
>ubuntu doesn't use -t as they have takeover set in initramfs-tools by
>default, thus probably it went unnoticed there.
So why don't you drop that option instead, if it is always forced?
>> mkinitrd provided a limited set of commands needed by kernels to
>> automate generating ramdisks. This interface is what both
>> initramfs-tools and yaird implemented and still used by
>> kernel-package.
>>
>> I believe that option caused problems in the past for initramfs-tools
>> to have that option enabled by default, leading to the change in 0.53
>> (or really 0.53c).
>>
>> Why do recent linux-2.6 need to introduce the use of the -t option?
>
>read man update-initramfs -t section.
I did. It describes a feature of a generic tool, not about special
needs of official Debian kernels.
>we want to be sure to really ship the latest modules, it has to be
>reentrant.
Is that a different need for official kernels than other kernels?
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkm1OHAACgkQn7DbMsAkQLhCSACeNQjQ9LoAk8dTkD2uDYxRFmLB
QzwAn32y9tmr5Jv6aIO1tage4OFAlsxU
=4dT+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Yaird-devel
mailing list