[Blend-fluxbox-devel] General questions - Issues (was: Re: Wiki update)

[Erik Josefsson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hello everybody!

Best wishes for the New Year, and, for this New Blend! :-)

On 31/12/15 11:46, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Can we try avoid gksu altogether for now - or are you certain it is 
> really needed?  If need is for udevil to work, then maybe udiskie (jus
t
> entered unstable few days ago) is a better alternative.

I have a general question about the selection of alternatives.

Jonas, you mentioned in an early thread that there are "thousands of
issues to address in Debian"[1].

Would a "lightweight blend" like the fluxbox blend mean that it aims to
be "lightweight" also in terms of classes of issues (among the
thousands) that are more or less difficult to resolve?

Thanks!

Best regards.

//Erik

[1]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/blend-fluxbox-devel/2015-Decemb
er/000012.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWhSsEAAoJEEQJK+0DIPSkBo0H/i9zJ6r1bDGZYGLDMpmMO6Fv
ivNwC+rBq9a9ZDud3jyNGKd8lZBk6F2DFFE3AO5YbuGEqcCY9DCw5OvJsLdADopL
6Xo8u+smO0CHb/1NV8E9y+MPIeSnues26Afwb75GHh4+ed2gV48j0e/RvJF7WRUm
WuGDmhXKBwx2Yu5wq1npAVsYSEqlyCK7C4DR9B+UWKkKj3P0hQmhFR9HxJ7kgBln
LnCs3C2lPiGXxtSpzgfVLz1btph9vRsPxGWsFLbWqsTtbTXsm7Mr507AWkNx9ado
no6PRm6nUJUyOCLK+hiF2ug+oG7ydKMCgZtcahFKbmlWcSsUhR/2c/OISFR4JyU=
=sO1L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----