[Build-common-hackers] Per package DEB_DH_SHLIBDEPS_ARGS?
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 21:47:23 -0500
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 19:02, Colin Walters wrote:
> > Shouldn't DEB_DH_SHLIBDEPS_ARGS be per package? The debhelper manpage
> > seems to suggest that it should be.
> > This needed to solve 233776 properly.
DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS =3D $(DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS_ALL)
Yar, I had missed this line. =3D( I'm itching to rewrite parts of cdbs to
be consistent. I wonder if we can do it without bumping to version 2.
> > When do the rest of us get commit access again, Colin? =3D)
> I'm still waiting on the alioth admins to install Python 2.3 so we can
> use arch-pqm (http://verbum.org/arch-pqm/). In the meantime could you
> make your own archive tagged from b-c-h, and I can pull patches that
I'll try to figure that out in the next day or so.
I never know what to expect when you respond to my postings. No insult
intended, you are merely a surprise :)
- Carlos O'Donnell
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----