[Build-common-hackers] Per package DEB_DH_SHLIBDEPS_ARGS?

[Colin Walters]

--=-ee1uMiY8JjXwJM671R/6
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 18:40, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Shouldn't DEB_DH_SHLIBDEPS_ARGS be per package?  The debhelper manpage
> seems to suggest that it should be.
>=20
> This needed to solve 233776 properly.

Yeah, makes sense.

> When do the rest of us get commit access again, Colin? =3D)

I'm still waiting on the alioth admins to install Python 2.3 so we can
use arch-pqm (http://verbum.org/arch-pqm/).  In the meantime could you
make your own archive tagged from b-c-h, and I can pull patches that
way?


--=-ee1uMiY8JjXwJM671R/6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAO+YUOIkJWWp2WGURAnDzAJwLWR4nAdxhRrsJG3+TtifliraNHQCfWs/S
E5Erpl8kV+zdd988ozK+d8k=
=ZDGe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-ee1uMiY8JjXwJM671R/6--