[buildd-tools-devel] Bug#774415: From srebuild sbuild-wrapper to debrebuild

[Holger Levsen]

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 01:50:11AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Given all these arguments, adding a --rebuild-and-verify=foo.buildinfo option
> to sbuild sounds like the most sane thing to do. It would even not require the
> existing interface to change (the positional argument is a single source
> package).
> 
> Any thoughts?

as long as there's a short version of --rebuild-and-verify=foo.buildinfo
such as (for example) -rb=foo.buildinfo fine with me… :)

(though I'm not sure I fully understand why not assume -rb if
foo.buildinfo is given - I do understand for foo.changes…)


-- 
cheers,
	Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/buildd-tools-devel/attachments/20161221/2db28aa1/attachment-0001.sig>