[buildd-tools-devel] Bug#774415: Bug#774415: From srebuild sbuild-wrapper to debrebuild

[Johannes Schauer]

Quoting Holger Levsen (2016-12-21 02:08:57)
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 01:50:11AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > Given all these arguments, adding a --rebuild-and-verify=foo.buildinfo option
> > to sbuild sounds like the most sane thing to do. It would even not require the
> > existing interface to change (the positional argument is a single source
> > package).
> > 
> > Any thoughts?
> 
> as long as there's a short version of --rebuild-and-verify=foo.buildinfo
> such as (for example) -rb=foo.buildinfo fine with me… :)

the -r short option is still free.

> (though I'm not sure I fully understand why not assume -rb if foo.buildinfo
> is given - I do understand for foo.changes…)

 - Because I'm not so sure that the user is aware that passing a .buildinfo
   file will mean that sbuild is querying snapshot.d.n without asking the user
   for further consent.

 - Because then we would only allow .buildinfo files that include the source
   package hash as well which I find quite limiting - especially considering
   how the Debian autobuilders will exclusively generate .buildinfo files of
   that kind

Thanks!

cheers, josch
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/buildd-tools-devel/attachments/20161221/06c17030/attachment.sig>