[CJKUnifonts-devel] (no subject)

Walter Cheuk wwycheuk at gmail.com
Fri Nov 21 01:10:49 UTC 2014


 I know that Firefly's New Sung/New Kai are even better than
UMing/UKai, but the problems are: 1. They are not publicly available,
or hard to find now (opendesktop.org.tw is closed); 2. UMing/UKai are
installed by default by many distros, including Ubuntu, but New
Sung/New Kai are not.

> 2014-11-21 0:24 GMT+08:00 Chow Lok Yuen <bc_cly at yahoo.com.hk>:
>> There was already AR PL New Kai by OpenDesktop in Taiwan. The aim of
>> OpenDesktop to develop
>> New Kai and New Sung was to replace the Windows counterpart -- DFKai-SB and
>> PMingLiU.
>> In order to making OO.o (OpenOffice.org) documents compatible with the
>> documents created by
>> Office Suite software, OpenDesktop adjusted some Font metrics of New Kai and
>> New Sung so that
>> when people opens the documents using OpenOffice, the text (especially
>> Chinese text using DFKai-SB
>> and PMingLiU) can by replaced by New Kai and New Sung without spatial
>> relocation. OpenDesktop
>> was a project funded by Taiwan Government to promote using open source
>> software such as OO.o and Linux
>> instead of using propietary software.
>>
>> Therefore, it is better to use AR PL New Kai than AR PL UKai HK. Also, the
>> glyphs inside CJK Basic range
>> look better in AR PL New Kai. I made about 130 CJK Ext. C and 155 CJK Ext. D
>> glyphs. I am glad to see
>> if someone can include my work to AR PL New Kai.
>>
>> PeTerChow
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Walter Cheuk <wwycheuk at gmail.com> 於 2014年11月20日 (週四) 10:59 AM 寫道﹕
>>
>>
>> Very glad to hear that someone is still developing UKai, because it is
>> installed by default by many distros, including Ubuntu, so it is very
>> suitable for filling the 'holes' left by other fonts. But it is not
>> releasing new versions, why?



More information about the CJKUnifonts-devel mailing list