[Collab-maint-devel] Re: Collaborative maintenance, time to work

[Keegan Quinn]

On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 08:09:05PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> Em Seg, 2006-02-06 às 23:51 +0100, Raphael Hertzog escreveu:
> > Except that I would have included the very latest "trunk/HEAD" version and not
> > the last tagged one ... care to explain why you'd prefer the last tagged
> > one ?
> 
> usually the untagged is probably broken... when something is finished,
> the changelog entry and the tag are created (I work this way, actually,
> I don't know if this is the common practice) I like to commit a lot even
> before the work is completely done...

In my experience, that is the opposite of common practice.  Most people
commit only working code, and you may find some people become rather
annoyed with you when you fail to do so.  :)

HTH.

-- 
Keegan Quinn  <keegan at thebasement.org>
CEO, Producer
the basement productions
http://www.thebasement.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/collab-maint-devel/attachments/20060206/712261c8/attachment-0001.pgp