[cut-team] Debian stable + backports versus Debian testing CUT

[davi at gnu.org]

Rob wrote:
> In fact, I wonder if this whole "constantly usable testing" effort would
> be better off focusing on backports for stable instead.

I do not think so.

"Constantly Usable Testing" is something completely different to what stable 
with even more backports would be.  That is because of testing is completely 
different to stable, as it includes all the updated software not only a per 
cent which backports would provide.


I think Constantly Usable Testing (CUT) is the best Debian move since some 
time ago. And it is easy to work out. It just need the analysis and planning 
which is being already done in this mailing list and others, and work out 
without any hurry.

When it be ready it will be great.